It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:28 pm


A bunch of rebalances

Chat with other players about your DoWO experience!
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Deuzerre

  • Posts: 202
  • Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:28 pm

A bunch of rebalances

PostFri Feb 21, 2014 12:59 pm

For information, last patch changes:

Deuzerre wrote:Stat changes I noticed:

Wolf:
Fang -5AP, Bloodlust replaced by Ferocious
WwCB -6AP, -1MOV, -1DOD, Accuracy replaced by Ferocious
WLW -4AP, +1DAM, -1 TOU, +1 WIL
WH (UNCHANGED)
GotR +2 AP, -2DAM, -2TOU [OUCH, that's a heavy nerf, not sure it was necessary :? ]
GG +27AP
PoB +33AP, -2DOD, -1DAM, -2TOU, +1 WIL [I think it was too nerfed, especially -1DAM.
Worg -11AP, +1DAM,

RAM:
SkeWar: No stat change, but nerfed by LVL 2 ability costs.
SkeArch: -3AP, +1DAM, -1TOU [Weaker but hits harder for cheaper? Ok, I guess]
Necro: -12AP
Gargo: +1AP
PoS: +3AP
BP: +2AP, +1DAM
SW: +36AP, -1TOU [It was clearly too cheap, but the -1TOU may be overkill]
FGoA: +46AP, otherwise unchanged [I really hoped for mobility and rapidity to be on the same level so they couldn't both be taken]

LION:
Sword: -1AP, [but it's the cheapest at level 2 with minimum 31AP, and max 32AP]
Bow: Unchanged [And "Sharpshooter" still costs way too much]
MoA: -7AP
LoW: +1AP
VoA: +4AP, but a nerf on its Favorable Auspices
SoL: -3AP [OK, now this is broken. A horde of them with a magician can cast homing missiles you can't do anything about, and for much cheaper]
KotL: +55AP, -2DAM [-2DAM is overkill when combined with the cost icnrease]
LotC +37AP


Now, with those in mind there are several things to be noted:
- Elites have had their price increased and several stats nerfed, but it seems those changes were independant: The stats were changed but the cost increases cover the old stats.

+ several anomalies, so I'll come up with my suggestions on how to rebalance elites so they're interesting, instead of the massive hordes of regulars we see at the moment.

I find that most "specialists" are OK, so will not really change them.

Wolf:
-Fang +5AP
The Fang Warrior had the right price in the previous patch, I don't see any reason to buff it with -5.
WwCB +4AP, +1MOV, Harassment shot prevents the use of run (Basically, you can move a part of your movement distance, shoot, then finish your movement, but not run).
The idea here is to prevent harassment stance from being as OP as it was before the patch, but also prevent the contant running. Harassment stance should, IMO, be better spent on moving a part of your movement to pop out of a wall shoot and hide again, not move 5, shoot, move 5 somewhere else. That's why the move goes back to 6: So that harassment would have enough room.
-WLW
I think the lonewolf is kind of fine as it is now.
-WH
Fine as it is, was unchanged anyway.
-GotR -1TOU, +1WIL
The reason of the +1 wil is that it's supposed, by the fluff, to be more of a scholar than a fighter. You reduced its damage down to 7 (same as a human, I won't comment further) but kept his will at 10 when it actually has a spell that can only be cast once per game with a difficulty of 10. Don't you find this kinda dumb? Most of the stats of that guy don't actually make sense (it's really tough, despite not being a fighter, etc...). That thing is already hard to use due to being orthodox in a faction with very few units.
-GG
Most fine of all elites, stays as it is for me.
-PoB -5AP, +1DAM
I'm simply making it a bit cheaper and back to hitting hard: It is currently a glass cannon that does the "canon" part rather badly. I'm fine with the DOD and TOU nerfs, and it was the most cost-effective elite before so the changes make a bit more sense. One thing that's not entirely related would be to invert "Hard Boiled" and "Fierce" in its research tree (so it would have FIERCE as basic trait and Hard boiled at level 4) to make it an interesting, yet suicidal, unit.
-Worg
Need more experimental data

RAM:
-SkeWar: Replace "Ferocious" with "Fierce". This would make it more interesting in the sense that with its poor stats, it doesn't make a good "fierce" unit (can't really hit the targets it's supposed to hit for 6 damage and already has good base damage) but Fierce would make it better at holding an enemy (preventing them to do pursuits). Also makes more sense to have it on the warrior than Archer. Would also give a cheaper option for level 2 that are all very costly skills, ruining the point of levelling up the Skeletons.
-SkeArch: Get rid of Fierce.
It makes no sense to have it on a ranged unit.
-Necro:
Fine as it is.
-Gargo:
Fine as it is.
-PoS: -3AP
It got pretty nerfed with Bad Omen's nerf. No reason to increase it's price.
-BP: Change Exhausting touch's range down to 1
So the BP has to be in contact with the enemy to cast it, making it riskier to use and harder to cast.
-SW: +1 TOU
Putting it back as a very tough guy. The price increase was overdone if it's not as tough as before.
-FGoA: Invert "Rutheless" and "Rapidity" in the research
This way, a Golem player will have to chose between crossing cover without penaties or moving +1. The possibility for a golem to have both is currently waaaay over the top, since the Golem only has to move 8 across the map every turn (by running) to be in contact with an enemy that will have to make a DOD roll it'll probably fail (due to the Golem's high accuracy)

LION:
-Sword:
Fine
-Bow: Reduce the cost of "Sharpshooter" skill
It really costs a lot for minimal interest
-MoA: Seal of Dellar'n should only have 2 activations per turn to limit the "heat seeking" sparks that ruin VIP games and any deck that relies on some squishy units (assault, Faithful, magician, archer)
-LoW:
Fine
-VoA:
Sort of fine
-SoL: +3 AP
They're really good, there was no reason to buff them with a price decrease; Their mobility is unmatched, and they're great healers+"squishies" killers.
-KotL: -25
It's currently way overpriced for what it does.
-[b]LotC

Can't comment on it yet, haven't even seen one.

EDIT: Corrected a lot of typos.
Last edited by Deuzerre on Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Offline

Almanro

  • Posts: 237
  • Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:31 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostFri Feb 21, 2014 2:56 pm

I agree with Deuzerre and its proposed changes. I'll however de-nerf more the three elites! At the moment, FOUR Fang lvl 1 cost less than a PoB lvl4!
Offline
User avatar

Dragon_Warrior

  • Posts: 1054
  • Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:40 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostFri Feb 21, 2014 5:42 pm

LION:
-Sword:
Fine

no way - he is less useful than Skeleton warrior. PAR stat is overpriced currently while PAR<<TOU... PAR can be usefull but from a quite high value and only compared with high will (fear counters PAR as hell)... For now in Swordsman Vs Disfigured skeleton there is 25% chance that Swordsman will be so much weaker...

Mostly its all about STR/TOU unfortunately and Swordsman is terrible in both.
ign: Draconnor, Cynwall player, 23 years in computer games, 14 years in battle games, 8 years in Confrontation Universe, 4 years of making own battle games.
Image
Offline
User avatar

Deep Blue

  • Posts: 844
  • Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:46 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostFri Feb 21, 2014 7:25 pm

I think the "elite" problem is connected to the fact that the basic units are VERY cheap.
Closed beta tester - Ram & Wolf player

Useful links:
AP army calculator (by Hod): http://dogsofwar.eu.pn/
Offline
User avatar

Deuzerre

  • Posts: 202
  • Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:28 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostFri Feb 21, 2014 8:07 pm

Dragon_Warrior wrote:
LION:
-Sword:
Fine

no way - he is less useful than Skeleton warrior. PAR stat is overpriced currently while PAR<<TOU... PAR can be usefull but from a quite high value and only compared with high will (fear counters PAR as hell)... For now in Swordsman Vs Disfigured skeleton there is 25% chance that Swordsman will be so much weaker...

Mostly its all about STR/TOU unfortunately and Swordsman is terrible in both.


Skeletons are better at level 1, but worse at level 2: They only get overpriced abilities.
You also forgot that there's 75% chance the Swordsman gets +1 strengh.
And that the SkeWar can't dodge for crap.

In short:
Sword is better at Hitting stuff, parrying stuff.
Sword is average at dodging stuff, keeping cool, taking hits
Sword is bad at dealing damage (compensated if success on fear roll)

Skeleton is good at damaging stuff, taking hits
Skeleton is average at hitting stuff
Skeleton is bad at dodging
Skeleton is terrible at parrying, will-based stuff (not fearless).
But it's cheaper.

The sword is therefore good at holding the line, and even survives more than the warriors, thanks to high parry, against anything that isn't elite.
The skeleton is only good at taking hits and beating on already wounded stuff.

In a "horde" meta, I'm surprised that you underrate parry.

EDIT:
I just had a game as "Hooomans" 200 pts (rebuilding my Alahan) and face a RAM army.

I had 1 lvl 1 warrior, 1 level 2 warriror with parry, one level 2 Valkyrie with the stance and 1 level 2 archer with accuracy.
He had 3 Skeleton warriors, 2 skeleton archers and a level 2 necro with morbid explosion (didn't bother with the grunt's details).

Despite a super-lucky turn where the RAM player shot twice at his own men in a 95% chance offensive stance on an archer, I survived (and won) thanks to a munch of parry rolls while my attacks always had a 100% chance to hit, only failed one Fear roll (and it was on the archer) the rest of the time I was always virtually Strengh 8. His archers couldn't hit my guys with regularity while mine certainly could hit his. It all ended with a good valkyrie round where I managed to almost kill his necro, and the game was in the bag.
Offline
User avatar

Deep Blue

  • Posts: 844
  • Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:46 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostSat Feb 22, 2014 12:40 am

as he said i dont think you have to compare strictly two basic units as you should see them in a context. Taunt is extremely annoying if played correctly...

what i would like to see in the future is something to counter heal. Heck, the priest of saluel should have aura of the crepuscular princes made like: units within the area can't be healed for 1 turn....instead of a mere +2 fear buff for 1 turn.
I remember a Crane warrior (Melmoth) having a sword that negates healing effects so it is even correct, background wise to provide Ram with an anti-heal ability.
Closed beta tester - Ram & Wolf player

Useful links:
AP army calculator (by Hod): http://dogsofwar.eu.pn/
Offline
User avatar

Deuzerre

  • Posts: 202
  • Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:28 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostSat Feb 22, 2014 12:44 am

I'd like something even more nasty... Like "Inverted healing": "Any regeneration or heal cause damage instead". :twisted:
Offline
User avatar

Deep Blue

  • Posts: 844
  • Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:46 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostSat Feb 22, 2014 12:54 am

Deuzerre wrote:I'd like something even more nasty... Like "Inverted healing": "Any regeneration or heal cause damage instead". :twisted:


that would be mean, but something to avoid healing running rampant would be nice. I like that every mechanic has also a counter...otherwise certain units (sparklings/valks) are a no brainer.

Now that i think about it, is it intended that the sparkling can recharge mana + heal in the same turn? why the hell it has an "artifact" ability? :D
Closed beta tester - Ram & Wolf player

Useful links:
AP army calculator (by Hod): http://dogsofwar.eu.pn/
Offline
User avatar

Dragon_Warrior

  • Posts: 1054
  • Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:40 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostSat Feb 22, 2014 7:23 am

Sparks should simply Heal 5hp or have a skill cost rised from 10 to 20
Taunt is extremely annoying if played correctly...

Taunt have until end of turn duration and activatig swordsman as a first unit in turn is so much unefective...

They would be ok with additional -3ap (and but none knews why this was a Sparkling not swordsman buff.
ign: Draconnor, Cynwall player, 23 years in computer games, 14 years in battle games, 8 years in Confrontation Universe, 4 years of making own battle games.
Image
Offline
User avatar

Deuzerre

  • Posts: 202
  • Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:28 pm

Re: A bunch of rebalances

PostSun Feb 23, 2014 4:33 pm

Dragon_Warrior wrote:Sparks should simply Heal 5hp or have a skill cost rised from 10 to 20
Taunt is extremely annoying if played correctly...

I agree. Some full heal compositions are almost unbreakable.
Next

Return to General Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

cron