Well, I own golem and chimera and yes, they re fun.
How can they be fun?
People are all different... I dislike by instance those playing swarms with like 5 hb skeletons and I ask myself (how can playing that way be fun?) but they exists... and I thx god (or the devs) that golem exists so those playing that way got countered...
It is all about countering a tactic and I prefer this way than having everyone playing one way.
The fun is that my ram team has 3 possible compositions, 1) with golem, 2) with black paladins, 3)with 2 lvl 3 necros archers with ferocious and a lot of warriors.
These 3 different possibilities make me counter every legendary in the game, so it is not like legendaries are very hard to defeat the problem is simply that those who want to play swarmy(without precautions) got countered by legendaries and then they come in the forum qqing (not saying this is what you were doing) instead than trying to change their team.
Errol Flynn wrote:If legendries remain this common in ranked matches real fans of the TBS genre will walk away.
I dont remember I voted you my representative... talk for yourself pls.
Errol Flynn wrote:The game is not P2W but people meeting too many Legendaries early would certainly be justified in thinking it is.
I have not spent a single cent yet and I own 2 and have still enought money to buy 2 more legendaries... with the current money system you can make 20k in one week easily if you want, so I really dont see the relation between legendaries and pay2win but ok... I guess every possible (even not related) argument is valid?