Page 1 of 1

0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:07 pm
by Deep Blue
first bug spotted: defensive stance.

Now that stances carry over until the next activation...you can't perform an attack if in the previous turn you used defensive stance...unless you move. I dont think it is intended.

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:48 pm
by Legulysse
Arg ! Sorry we missed this one.
We will see if we can fix it on your version without a full deployment.

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 6:49 pm
by Dragon_Warrior
its realy terrible ;)

btw - offensive stance drawback also stays on next turn activation.

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 6:52 pm
by Legulysse
Yeah, we spotted the offensive stances bugs when cross checking with the other stance ;)

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:42 am
by Dragon_Warrior
Legulysse wrote:Yeah, we spotted the offensive stances bugs when cross checking with the other stance ;)

and Divine Favour lasts only until end of turn

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:51 am
by Legulysse
Divine Favor is intended to only last for the current turn.
The bug on the offensive stance doesn't concern the malus on PAR, which is also intended.
I was only talking about "number of attacks" handling on new turn.

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:07 pm
by Dragon_Warrior
I was only talking about "number of attacks" handling on new turn.

but next turn unit have base number of atack - so its ok propably ?
the problem is PAR 0 durning next turn atack (at counteratack purposes) - it was also intended?

Divine Favor is intended to only last for the current turn.

ok for ACC but it was also intended for PAR bonus ?
personaly i use it rather like small defensive stance than for ACCbonus.

Re: 0.11 defensive stance bug

PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:03 pm
by Legulysse
Dragon_Warrior wrote:but next turn unit have base number of atack - so its ok propably ?
the problem is PAR 0 durning next turn atack (at counteratack purposes) - it was also intended?

PAR 0 is intended.
The bug is an exploit on new turn with number of attacks (same bug as defensive stance).
Dragon_Warrior wrote:ok for ACC but it was also intended for PAR bonus ?

Yes.
Consider it as a bonus against retaliations.