Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:30 pm
While waiting for the big january patch....here is a feedback for the confrontation wiki. I'll divide it in some subpoints:
- Right not there isn't much content about the armies. I remember each character having is own "background" on the reference cards. It would be lovely to have the main "heroes" (at least for the playable races in the game) described with some background or the main sub-factions of each race (ie: House Mantis for Acheron). I know it takes time but having more lore behind is always a plus for any game and luckly for you confrontation already has it so why not using it more? Are there any plans to expand it ? It feels right now that you put only images (which are indeed nice)
- History page is way too short in my opinion...it is like if GW would describe 40k universe in half a page. Also i noticed lot of typos especially the word "the" that is spelled "th e" or "thus --> th us"
- Licence chronology....I love and hate this page at the same time, let me explain. I love it because there you can find all the official confrontation books (well most of them actually..no army books) and i hate it because i cannot open all of them. I would appreciate if you could fix the links , unless it is only my problem of course. Also...i deeply hate "licence chronology" as a title. I am no native english speaker so i might be wrong here but it feels a bit misleading the title. Why not using the more intuitive: The miniature game or...Tabletop rule books?
-Places section is nice, not much to add there.
-Videogames: ok a little short but is fine. I noticed some typos there as well. Just one question: why not putting also "confrontation", your very first game about the Aarklash in the list? i know it wasn't really as succesful as aarklash legacy but...isn't still a videogame?
How other players feel about it?
- Right not there isn't much content about the armies. I remember each character having is own "background" on the reference cards. It would be lovely to have the main "heroes" (at least for the playable races in the game) described with some background or the main sub-factions of each race (ie: House Mantis for Acheron). I know it takes time but having more lore behind is always a plus for any game and luckly for you confrontation already has it so why not using it more? Are there any plans to expand it ? It feels right now that you put only images (which are indeed nice)
- History page is way too short in my opinion...it is like if GW would describe 40k universe in half a page. Also i noticed lot of typos especially the word "the" that is spelled "th e" or "thus --> th us"
- Licence chronology....I love and hate this page at the same time, let me explain. I love it because there you can find all the official confrontation books (well most of them actually..no army books) and i hate it because i cannot open all of them. I would appreciate if you could fix the links , unless it is only my problem of course. Also...i deeply hate "licence chronology" as a title. I am no native english speaker so i might be wrong here but it feels a bit misleading the title. Why not using the more intuitive: The miniature game or...Tabletop rule books?
-Places section is nice, not much to add there.
-Videogames: ok a little short but is fine. I noticed some typos there as well. Just one question: why not putting also "confrontation", your very first game about the Aarklash in the list? i know it wasn't really as succesful as aarklash legacy but...isn't still a videogame?
How other players feel about it?
Closed beta tester - Ram & Wolf player
Useful links:
AP army calculator (by Hod): http://dogsofwar.eu.pn/
Useful links:
AP army calculator (by Hod): http://dogsofwar.eu.pn/
